| |

Liability for errors in DIWASS – the carrier, the freight forwarder or the consignor?

Responsibility at DIWASS

Contact us and entrust the care of your business to professionals:
e.nadolna@ekologistyka24.pl +48 881 045 376
j.blazewicz@ekologistyka24.pl +48 500 867 153

Why does the issue of liability at DIWASS raise so many questions?

Under the paper-based system, many inaccuracies „got lost” in the flow of documents. Things are different now. DIWASS creates a complete electronic audit trail, and every notification, confirmation and decision is retained in the system. What is more, monitoring is no longer carried out retrospectively – transport is supervised in real time.

In practice, this means that A mistake by a single participant can jeopardise the entire journey. If, for example, a single entity is not correctly recorded in the system, the authority may question the legality of the entire operation. It is also worth bearing in mind that the illegal movement of waste is often purely a technical matter – even when the physical transport has been carried out correctly.

Division of responsibilities – who is responsible for what?

Regulation (EU) 2024/1157 assigns responsibilities according to the participants„ roles, rather than according to who actually ”clicks’ within the system. In other words, entrusting the handling of DIWASS to a broker does not relieve the organiser of the movement of their responsibility.

RoleMain responsibilities at DIWASSTypical liability
Consignor / organiser of the movementRegistration, notification (or Annex VII), the accuracy of the data on the waste and the recipient, the contract with the recipientThe legality of the entire shipment, the correct classification of the waste, and the completeness of the notification
Broker / traderRegistering with the system, correctly assigning one’s own role, and providing accurate data to the partiesIncorrect assignment of a role; facilitating a transfer without the required documents
CarrierAccount registration, route compliance with the declaration, availability of documents during inspections, confirmations in the systemTransport without a valid declaration; the transport does not match the details in DIWASS
Recipient / installationConfirmation of receipt and processing of waste within the systemFailure to provide or delay in providing confirmations; acceptance of waste that does not comply with the declaration
Accountability at DIWASS – Evidence

The supervisory authorities (GIOŚ, WIOŚ, ITD, KAS) may summon every It is up to the person involved in the movement to prove that the transport is lawful. The burden of proof therefore shifts to the operators.

The most common errors in DIWASS – real-life examples

Experts point to several recurring scenarios that lead to sanctions or the detention of shipments:

  • Participant not registered – An unregistered company cannot legally take part in the movement, and the absence of a single entity from the system places a burden on the others.
  • Incorrect role assignment – for example, a broker designated as the organiser, or vice versa, which disrupts the entire chain of responsibility.
  • Incorrect waste code – incorrect classification may result in a „green list” shipment being reclassified as a shipment requiring notification.
  • Annex VII has been completed incorrectly – Blank fields or missing attachments will result in the application being rejected by the authority.
  • Discrepancy between the route and the declaration – A carrier travelling in a manner other than that declared risks having this treated as a procedural breach.
  • No verification of the recipient or recovery process – the organiser is also responsible for where the waste actually ends up and for what purpose.

What penalties are there for making mistakes?

The financial consequences are very real. Even now, a carrier transporting waste without the required documentation risks a fine of 10,000 zł. Furthermore, the draft of the new Polish Act raises the lower limit for fines for illegal shipments: to 50,000 zł for waste subject to notification and at least 30,000 zł for green-list waste. The upper limit remains at 1 million zł. Furthermore, the Chief Inspectorate for Environmental Protection (GIOŚ) will gain the right of recourse – it will be able to claim the costs of managing illegal waste from the responsible party.

How can you minimise the risk? A quick checklist

  • Verify your registration everyone those involved in the movement prior to the first transport.
  • Set out the roles in the contracts – who is the organiser, who is the broker, and who is simply providing transport.
  • Introduce a double-check system for the data in reports (waste code, weight, recipient, process).
  • Train drivers and dispatchers in how to handle roadside checks following the changes.
  • Document the verification of the recipient and the installation – this serves as evidence of due diligence.

Shared responsibility, but not blurred

Similar Posts